compilation failure in 64-bit mode linux system

Member Site Forums Rosetta++ Rosetta++ – General compilation failure in 64-bit mode linux system

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #449
      Anonymous

        Hi, I am a new user. I tried to install rosetta++ into my 64-bit mode system.

        Everything worked fine until I typed “make gcc”. The following appeared:

        g++ -c -I. -Isrc -Iexternal/include -Isrc/platform/linux -Wall -W -pedantic -Wno
        -unused-variable -pipe -ffor-scope -fno-exceptions -malign-double -ffast-math –
        funroll-loops -finline-functions -finline-limit=20000 -DNDEBUG -O3 -s -std=c++98
        -MMD -MT .gcc.version_rosetta.d -MF .gcc.version_rosetta.d -MP version_rosetta.
        cc -o .gcc.version_rosetta.o
        version_rosetta.cc:1: error: -malign-double makes no sense in the 64bit mode
        make: *** [.gcc.version_rosetta.o] Error 1

        Is this because the version cannot work for 64-bit mode system or what?

        Please help me out.

        Thank you very much.

      • #4379
        Anonymous

          I tried installing Rosetta 2.3 but failed. I think it has something to do with gcc setting for 64bit OS. Installing Rosetta 3.1 went well. Instead of using make gcc, I used scone.

          > Hi, I am a new user. I tried to install rosetta++ into my 64-bit mode system.
          >
          > Everything worked fine until I typed “make gcc”. The following appeared:
          >
          > g++ -c -I. -Isrc -Iexternal/include -Isrc/platform/linux -Wall -W -pedantic -Wno
          > -unused-variable -pipe -ffor-scope -fno-exceptions -malign-double -ffast-math –
          > funroll-loops -finline-functions -finline-limit=20000 -DNDEBUG -O3 -s -std=c++98
          > -MMD -MT .gcc.version_rosetta.d -MF .gcc.version_rosetta.d -MP version_rosetta.
          > cc -o .gcc.version_rosetta.o
          > version_rosetta.cc:1: error: -malign-double makes no sense in the 64bit mode
          > make: *** [.gcc.version_rosetta.o] Error 1
          >
          >
          >
          > Is this because the version cannot work for 64-bit mode system or what?
          >
          > Please help me out.
          >
          > Thank you very much.
          >
          >

      Viewing 1 reply thread
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.