Reply To: Successful installation on OpenSuse11.1 – tests?

[Anonymous]

Oh good. Scientific tests have also passed – don’t expect any more problems with the comparison run. So, it would seem that previous problems of 2.3.x with Suse was an unknown compiler/OS specific bug.

For future information:
– run log on Rosetta3.1/OpenSuse11.1 build using GCC (SUSE Linux) 4.3.2 and Python 2.6.

– Scons version: v1.1.0.d20081104.r3765

– Two results are for single thread and -j2:

sequence_recovery:
the identity for all positions is: 32.9% / 33.4%
hydrophobic non-polar amino acids (VAL,ILE,LEU,MET,PHE,GLY,ALA,PRO,TRP,TYR): 45.4% / 46.3%
polar uncharged amino acid except CYS (SER,THR,ASN,GLN): 20.4% / 18.9%
negative charged amino acid(ASP,GLU): 19.8% / 20.4%
positive charged amino acid(ARG,LYS,HIS): 14.7% / 16.1%

rna_denovo:
FARNA, 25th percentile rms (50 decoys): 2.39 / 2.40 [should be less than 3.00]
Hi-res refine, 25th percentile rms (50 decoys): 2.34 / 2.22 [should be less than 2.75]

rna_design:
no base pairs, seq. recovery: 0.41 / 0.39 [should be more than 0.30]
Watson/Crick bp, seq. recovery: 0.44 / 0.43 [should be more than 0.35]
non-Watson/Crick bp, seq. recovery: 0.78 / 0.74 [should be more than 0.70]
all RNA, seq. recovery: 0.53 / 0.51 [should be more than 0.45]
All tests passed.