Member Site › Forums › Rosetta 3 › Rosetta 3 – Applications › cartesian_ddg error: “Assertion `files.size() == 1` failed.”
- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 8 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
May 11, 2018 at 4:59 pm #2918Anonymous
I am trying to run the cartesian_ddg protocol (https://www.rosettacommons.org/docs/latest/cartesian-ddG).
I am using the following command:
cartesian_ddg.static.linuxgccrelease
-database $ROSETTADB
-s min_2b5i-A_0001_clean_0011.pdb
–ddg:mut_file themutfile.txt
-ddg:iterations 3
-ddg::cartesian
-ddg::dump_pdbs false
-bbnbr 1
-fa_max_dis 9.0
-beta_cart
where $ROSETTADB points to the database directory. I am attaching the .pdb and mutfile.
I am getting the following error:
Using mutfile: themutfile.txt
core.init: Rosetta version: rosetta.binary.linux.release-171 r171 2018.09+release.333d996 333d99699777cd6a50d1c1736bacd689f8f1d1df https://www.rosettacommons.org 2018-02-27T09:57:00.705373
core.init: command: cartesian_ddg.static.linuxgccrelease -database /home/cossio/apps/rosetta_bin_linux_2018.09.60072_bundle/main/database -s min_2b5i-A_0001_clean_0011.pdb –ddg:mut_file themutfile.txt -ddg:iterations 3 -ddg::cartesian -ddg::dump_pdbs false -bbnbr 1 -fa_max_dis 9.0 -beta_cart
core.init: 'RNG device' seed mode, using '/dev/urandom', seed=-2080023677 seed_offset=0 real_seed=-2080023677
core.init.random: RandomGenerator:init: Normal mode, seed=-2080023677 RG_type=mt19937
ERROR: Assertion `files.size() == 1` failed.
ERROR:: Exit from: src/basic/options/util.cc line: 49
BACKTRACE:
[0x58ccf98]
[0x5566c4a]
[0x4110dd]
[0x5e12cf4]
[0x61855d]
caught exception
File: src/basic/options/util.cc:49
[ ERROR ] UtilityExitException
ERROR: Assertion `files.size() == 1` failed.
-
May 18, 2018 at 4:25 pm #14239Anonymous
This is kinda tricky — you have an en-dash before ddg:mut_file, rather than a dash. This means that you’re effectively passing a filename “<endash>ddg:mut_file” to the -s parameter, which is why you’re getting the error about number of files.
This looks to be a mistake in the original documentation (which you apparently copy-pasted). Sorry about that. I’ll fix that for the next release.
-
May 18, 2018 at 4:51 pm #14240Anonymous
Wow, that was subtle. Thanks a lot for taking a look.
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.