Member Site › Forums › Rosetta 3 › Rosetta 3 – General › Jump::random_trans strange behavior
- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
November 3, 2015 at 3:56 pm #2352Anonymous
Hi to everyone!
I have a complex: protein and peptide (AB chains). I need to make small random shifts of peptide. I do it so
numeric::Real step_size(1.0);
core::kinematics::Jump flexible_jump = pose.jump(pose.num_jump());
flexible_jump.random_trans(step_size);
pose.set_jump( pose.num_jump(), flexible_jump );
However, peptide does a huge jump. flexible_jump.get_translation() gives something like (random value, 0, random value).
Description of the function “choose a random unit vector as the direction of translation, by selecting its spherical coordinates phi(0-180) and theta(0-360) then move dist_in along that direction”. In an attachment result of work (green selection is initial position).
That way works perfectly
core::Vector rand_vect;
for(numeric::Size i = 0; i < 3; i++ )
rand_vect.at(i) = numeric::random::rg().uniform();
rand_vect.normalize();
core::kinematics::Jump flexible_jump2 = pose.jump(pose.num_jump());
core::kinematics::Stub upstream_stub = pose.conformation().upstream_jump_stub(pose.num_jump());
flexible_jump2.translation_along_axis( upstream_stub, rand_vect, step_size );
pose.set_jump( pose.num_jump(), flexible_jump2 );
My questions:
1) Is it something wrong what I do in first case?
2) For what random_trans function exactly for?
3) What is the simplest way to do peptide shifts with variable step size (using jump)?
I use rosetta 2015.38
Thanks,
Sergey
-
November 3, 2015 at 6:11 pm #11305Anonymous
As I read things, the random_trans() method is reinitializing the jump to a random translation, whereas the translation_along_axis() method is simply adding the random pertubation to the existing translation in the jump. You can see this in the code, where translation_along_axis() adds a rt_.get_translation() to the random adjustment, whereas random_trans() just sets the adjustment itself.
Honestly, I’d probably use something like protocols::rigid::RigidBodyPerturbMover, which is set up for perturbing the rigid body position of a chain, rather than changing the jump directly. You can check out the apply() method for details, but the core of it actually uses Jump::gaussian_move() to do the random perturbation, if you do want to use low level code.
-
November 4, 2015 at 10:23 am #11306Anonymous
Well, it is really seens like reinitialization. However, I still do not understand why random translation vector have one fixed coordinate: y is always equals 0. Anyway I think RigidBodyPerturbMover is actually what I need. There are ways to use it without any movemaps, this fact escaped me. Thank you for your answer.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.