Params file for Methane

Member Site Forums Rosetta 3 Rosetta 3 – General Params file for Methane

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #3014
      Anonymous

        Hello all,

        I wanted to conform Rosetta params for Methane molecule which I have written (as molfile_to_params.py fails to create). Also, is there any specific method to create params compounds with no rotamer?


        NAME M3T
        IO_STRING M3T Z
        TYPE LIGAND
        AA UNK
        ATOM C1 CH3 X -0.29
        ATOM H1 Hapo X 0.07
        ATOM H2 Hapo X 0.07
        ATOM H3 Hapo X 0.07
        ATOM H4 Hapo X 0.07
        ATOM V1 VIRT X 0.00

        BOND_TYPE C1 H1 1
        BOND_TYPE C1 H2 1
        BOND_TYPE C1 H3 1
        BOND_TYPE C1 H4 1
        BOND_TYPE H1 V1 1

        NBR_ATOM C1
        NBR_RADIUS 2.185002

        ICOOR_INTERNAL C1 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 C1 H1 V1
        ICOOR_INTERNAL H1 0.000000 180.000000 1.535419 C1 H1 V1
        ICOOR_INTERNAL V1 0.000001 68.822455 1.095891 H1 C1 V1
        ICOOR_INTERNAL H2 -59.999912 70.526795 1.535368 C1 H1 V1
        ICOOR_INTERNAL H3 -119.998242 70.533101 1.535319 C1 H1 H2
        ICOOR_INTERNAL H4 -119.999459 70.527546 1.535390 C1 H1 H3

         

      • #14459
        Anonymous

          Looks somewhat reasonable to me.

          I don’t think you’d actually need the virtual atom, though. I think (though haven’t confirmed) that you should be fine with just the central carbon and having the hydrogens off it.

          As far as rotamers, you don’t need a separate rotamers file if you don’t need/want to do any conformational sampling. The ICOOR records should be sufficient for specifying the geometry. (molfile_to_params.py should work for ligands with only one conformation.  If you had issues, it was likely due to the small size, rather than having only one conformation.)

      Viewing 1 reply thread
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.