Member Site › Forums › Rosetta 3 › Rosetta 3 – Applications › RAbD with N-term,Proline-like ncaa returns segmentation fault during CCDEndsGraftMover
- This topic has 9 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 10 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
February 7, 2022 at 3:09 am #3907Anonymous
Recently I’m stumbling with rosetta RAbD application (version 2020.08.61146) in hope to modify an antibody whose antigen containing a non-canonical,N-term, and PRO-like aa ,namely the pyroglutamic acid in its epitope.
I generated params file according tutorials in :https://new.rosettacommons.org/demos/latest/public/design_with_ncaa/README,with input mol file below.
the product params runs properly during dock,relax,and RAbD’s seq_design mode (except for wrong number in N-term hydrogen adding). but when doing graft design ,the application failed during CCDEndsGraftMover with a segmentation fault.
I had a series of attempts to solve the problem:
I fixed the patch file in database/chemical/residue_type_sets/fa_standard( and centroid ) /patches .
I tried to use Pro’s centroid Params for this one. I tried to modify the ICOOR_INTERNAL lines so as to make the fold tree grows from CA (rather than from N , as the python script generated) ,adding virtual N and cut_bonds(as Pro’s params does) .
I tried to change the value of NBR_RADIUS.
I even tried to modifying the params directly from PRO’s by adding an acyl-oxgen atoms.
Below are two files I finally got. Sadly neither of them works. Due to limit error message, it’s quite hard for me to debug the ‘segmentation fault’.
Can anyone give it a look and help me out ?
thank you very much.
-
February 7, 2022 at 4:23 am #16115Anonymous
This will be tricky. Can you attach a full log of the crash? I shoud be able to track it down from that.
-
February 7, 2022 at 5:04 pm #16118Anonymous
here is the crash log.
please note that warning in line 17-19,30,109-112,129 and 292-296 existed even if I had removed the NCAA
-
February 7, 2022 at 5:40 pm #16120Anonymous
Thanks. Is there anything in Rosetta_crash.log? Are you able to try running it in debug mode?
-
February 8, 2022 at 6:33 am #16123Anonymous
I don’t know how to run a debug mode. I’m searching for how to run it.
btw,I can offer the files needed for bug-repeating, would you need them?
-
February 9, 2022 at 2:13 am #16125Anonymous
Hi,
I added a flag: -out:level 500 to my original commands(/opt/rosetta_bin_linux_2020.08.61146_bundle/main/source/bin/antibody_designer.mpi.linuxgccrelease -s complex_3.pdb -primary_cdrs H1 -graft_design_cdrs H1 -do_dock -nstruct 1 -overwrite -constant_seed ).
but the file is larger than the size-limit of rosetta common. here is the last 7500 lines.
Is there anything useful? would you mind if I send the full log to your mailbox?
thank you for your kindly guide!
-
February 9, 2022 at 2:14 am #16122Anonymous
crash log is here. seems no valuable information.
-
February 10, 2022 at 3:39 am #16128Anonymous
Hi, I checked the logfile and find some creepy traces:
here are some lines indicating trouble with processing my ncaa:
core.chemical.Patch: (0) successfully patched: PCA to: DPCA
core.chemical.GlobalResidueTypeSet: (0) Residue 'PCA' not found in pdb components file, but is in regular ResidueTypeSet. Ignoring components.
core.chemical.GlobalResidueTypeSet: (0) Attempted to load 'PCA' from PDB components dictionary, but the appropriate entry wasn't found.
core.io.pose_from_sfr.PoseFromSFRBuilder: (0) Match: 'PCA:NtermProteinFull'; missing 7 coordinates
core.io.pose_from_sfr.PoseFromSFRBuilder: (0) [ WARNING ] discarding 1 atoms at position 123 in file complex_3.pdb. Best match rsd_type: PCA:NtermProteinFull
Warning! Unable to find countpair representatives for restype PCA
and here is the last error-like message before segmentation fault:
core.conformation.Conformation: (0) Residue 148 is not a branch point!
core.conformation.Conformation: (0) Residue 221 is not a branch point!may they have anything to do with the bug?
-
-
February 7, 2022 at 5:39 pm #16119Anonymous
I would wager that the pyro-glu is an artifact of crystallization. Unless you have specific knowledge that the pyro-glu is critical to the function of the antigen, I suggest you mutate it back to Gln and proceed on your way with the natural AA.
-
February 8, 2022 at 6:28 am #16121Anonymous
there are actually experimental evidences on the critical role of this pyro-glu . After the enzyme catalysing this PTM knocked out , this antigen almost loses its function.
See:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31462760/
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.