Member Site Forums ROSIE ROSIE – General Snugdock

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #3318
      Anonymous

        I have been running snugodck jobs on Rosie for a while but queue times are long so I am trying to run jobs locally.   I am getting the error below:

         

        ERROR: Sequence for partner1:

        EVQLVESGGGVVQPGRSLRLSCAASGFTFDRYGMHWVRQAPGKGPEWVAVISHDGSHEEYADSGKGRFTISRDNSKNTLYLQMNSLRAEDTAVYYCAKDGAYYYDYSGYPYDYNGIDVWGQGTTVVVSSALTQPHSASGPPDQTVTISCSGSSSNIEGNTVNWYQQFPGKAPQLLIYGKDQRPSGVPDRFSASKSGTSASLTISGLQAEDEADYYCAAWDDSLNGWVFGGGTKLTVLGQ

         does not match first member of ensemble1:

        SALTQPHSASGPPDQTVTISCSGSSSNIEGNTVNWYQQFPGKAPQLLIYGKDQRPSGVPDRFSASKSGTSASLTISGLQAEDEADYYCAAWDDSLNGWVFGGGTKLTVLGQEVQLVESGGGVVQPGRSLRLSCAASGFTFDRYGMHWVRQAPGKGPEWVAVISHDGSHEEYADSGKGRFTISRDNSKNTLYLQMNSLRAEDTAVYYCAKDGAYYYDYSGYPYDYNGIDVWGQGTTVVVS

         

        Prepack runs fine using:

        ../main/source/bin/docking_prepack_protocol.macosclangrelease -in:file:s 136C_1.pdb -ex1 -ex2 -partners LH_EFG -ensemble1 antibody_ensemble.list -ensemble2 antigen_ensemble.list -docking:dock_rtmin

         

         

        For snugdock I am using:    (only 5 structures just to see if it is working):

        ../main/source/bin/snugdock.macosclangrelease -s 136C_1.pdb -ensemble1 antibody_ensemble.list -ensemble2 antigen_ensemble.list -antibody:auto_generate_kink_constraint -antibody:all_atom_mode_kink_constraint -partners LH_EFG -spin -dock_pert 3 8 -ex1 -ex2aro -nstruct 5

         

        The error says that sequence for partner 1 is the heavy chain, but in the PDB files the light chain is first.

      • #15094
        Anonymous

          Hi,

          Can you check via a TextEditor (this is important because PyMOL will order chains alphabetically) whether or not the prepacked files listed in “antibody_ensemble.list” have the same order as the file “136C_1.pdb”? 

          Due Rosetta’s internal representation, all the files have to have the chains in the same order and this order has to match the “-partners” flag.

          Best,

          Jeliazko

          • #15095
            Anonymous

              Jeliazco,

              I checked all the files by texteditor and they all are L followed by H.  FYI – attached are a prepacked file from the antibody_ensemble.list, and also the partner1_starting_conf file, and 136C_1.pdb (I truncated the antigen part so that file is less than 512KB limit for uploading).  (I put txt as the file extension since ppk cannot be uploaded).

               

              136C_1.pdb is an output file from a snugdock run on the ROSIE server.  136C_1.pdb is fine as input when I use snugdock on the ROSIE server.

               

              Thanks very much for your help.

          • #15099
            Anonymous

              Dear Mike,

              First, sorry about the long wait. I was sick and then traveling for the holidays. Looking at these files, the command line you described should work, so I am surprised.  I did not know about the upload limit on the forum. I would like to try to replicate the error on my machine. Would you mind emailing everything necessary to do so?

              You can contact me at jeliazkov@jhu.edu.

              Best,

              Jeliazko

            • #15101
              Anonymous

                Jeliazko,

                 

                Thanks very much.  I will send you everything by email.

                In the meantime I have been running snugdock with just a single antibody and antigen, without ensembles, on a local platform.   I am trying to repeat a fast snugdock trial that I ran previously on Rosie, to make sure that I get similar results.  I use the snugdock commands given above but without the ensemble commands.  The runs finish but I find that the range for Irms is much larger than for the fast snugdock run on Rosie.   What flags corresponds to fast snugdock on Rosie?

                 

                Thanks,

                Mike

            Viewing 3 reply threads
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.