all-atom modelling and clustering

Member Site Forums Rosetta++ Rosetta++ – General all-atom modelling and clustering

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #554
      estrauch
      Participant

        Dear all

        I would like implement the most recent/accurate all-atom Rosetta protocols. In other words, 2 rounds, in the first of which quick backbone models are generated and clustered (the aa protocol). In round 2, members of the largest clusters are all-atom modelled (the cc relax protocol), reclustered and the lowest energy model of the largest cluster taken as the final model. I have a few queries

        – can the modelling of homologs of the target (Bradley et al 2005) be done automatically?

        – is there a consensus view on whether single or multiple models should be generated from each starting point in round 2? (this was the subject of a previous thread but no clear opinion seemed to emerge)

        – can Rosetta cluster the all-atom models at the end of round 2? the rosetta_scripts/abinitio/bin/cluster.pl script, as far as I can tell, works with a silentfile which would be the result of a single run, and would only contain backbone in any case. If Rosetta can’t, what tools would people recommend?

        Many thanks in advance

        Dan

      • #4002
        Anonymous

          Please check the following answers from Dr Bradley.

          > Dear all
          >
          > I would like implement the most recent/accurate all-atom Rosetta protocols. In other words, 2 rounds, in the first of which quick backbone models are generated and clustered (the aa protocol). In round 2, members of the largest clusters are all-atom modelled (the cc relax protocol), reclustered and the lowest energy model of the largest cluster taken as the final model. I have a few queries
          >
          > – can the modelling of homologs of the target (Bradley et al 2005) be done automatically?
          Not that I’m aware of. I did this using a collection of python scripts which have fallen into disuse.

          > – is there a consensus view on whether single or multiple models should be generated from each starting point in round 2? (this was the subject of a previous thread but no clear opinion seemed to emerge)
          My opinion would be that multiple models, say 3-5 should be generated due to the stochastic nature of the refinement protocol.

          > – can Rosetta cluster the all-atom models at the end of round 2? the rosetta_scripts/abinitio/bin/cluster.pl script, as far as I can tell, works with a silentfile which would be the result of a single run, and would only contain backbone in any case. If Rosetta can’t, what tools would people recommend?
          I’m not aware of all-atom clustering functionality in Rosetta.

          > Many thanks in advance
          >
          > Dan

        • #4003
          estrauch
          Participant

            Just to say thanks for these thoughts. Much appreciated. It’s a real luxury to get first-hand opinions from the people behind Rosetta.

            Dan

        Viewing 2 reply threads
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.