Member Site › Forums › Rosetta++ › Rosetta++ – General › all-atom modelling and clustering
- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by estrauch.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
July 25, 2008 at 9:02 am #554
Dear all
I would like implement the most recent/accurate all-atom Rosetta protocols. In other words, 2 rounds, in the first of which quick backbone models are generated and clustered (the aa protocol). In round 2, members of the largest clusters are all-atom modelled (the cc relax protocol), reclustered and the lowest energy model of the largest cluster taken as the final model. I have a few queries
– can the modelling of homologs of the target (Bradley et al 2005) be done automatically?
– is there a consensus view on whether single or multiple models should be generated from each starting point in round 2? (this was the subject of a previous thread but no clear opinion seemed to emerge)
– can Rosetta cluster the all-atom models at the end of round 2? the rosetta_scripts/abinitio/bin/cluster.pl script, as far as I can tell, works with a silentfile which would be the result of a single run, and would only contain backbone in any case. If Rosetta can’t, what tools would people recommend?
Many thanks in advance
Dan
-
July 29, 2008 at 1:55 pm #4002Anonymous
Please check the following answers from Dr Bradley.
> Dear all
>
> I would like implement the most recent/accurate all-atom Rosetta protocols. In other words, 2 rounds, in the first of which quick backbone models are generated and clustered (the aa protocol). In round 2, members of the largest clusters are all-atom modelled (the cc relax protocol), reclustered and the lowest energy model of the largest cluster taken as the final model. I have a few queries
>
> – can the modelling of homologs of the target (Bradley et al 2005) be done automatically?
Not that I’m aware of. I did this using a collection of python scripts which have fallen into disuse.> – is there a consensus view on whether single or multiple models should be generated from each starting point in round 2? (this was the subject of a previous thread but no clear opinion seemed to emerge)
My opinion would be that multiple models, say 3-5 should be generated due to the stochastic nature of the refinement protocol.> – can Rosetta cluster the all-atom models at the end of round 2? the rosetta_scripts/abinitio/bin/cluster.pl script, as far as I can tell, works with a silentfile which would be the result of a single run, and would only contain backbone in any case. If Rosetta can’t, what tools would people recommend?
I’m not aware of all-atom clustering functionality in Rosetta.> Many thanks in advance
>
> Dan -
July 30, 2008 at 8:27 am #4003
Just to say thanks for these thoughts. Much appreciated. It’s a real luxury to get first-hand opinions from the people behind Rosetta.
Dan
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.