Loop modeling with ligand in the receptor

Member Site Forums Rosetta 3 Rosetta 3 – General Loop modeling with ligand in the receptor

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #717
      Anonymous

        I have docked ligand in a receptor and now I want to perform a loop modeling. I tried using these flags:
        -in::file::extra_res_fa aral.params
        -loops::extra_res_fa aral.params
        … but rosetta returns; ERROR: Option matching -in:extra_res_fa not found in command line top-level
        Without these flags Rosetta returns:
        ERROR: unrecognized aa ARE
        (ARE is my ligand).

        So, how do I get loopmodel to recognize my ligand?

        Thanks,
        Christoffer

      • #4748
        Anonymous

          Try it as in:file:extra_res_fa (single colons instead of double colons). The error indicates the “file” part disappeared for some reason. Also try it with no prefixes (just extra_res_fa).

        • #4752
          Anonymous

            Thanks, that helped somewhat. But there is still some troubles.

            protocols.looprelax: ==== Loop protocol: =================================================
            protocols.looprelax: remodel perturb_kic
            protocols.looprelax: intermedrelax no
            protocols.looprelax: refine refine_kic
            protocols.looprelax: relax fastrelax
            core.chemical: can not find a residue type that matches the residue AREat position 296

            ERROR: switch_to_residue_type_set fails

            ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/chemical/util.cc line: 573

          • #4753
            Anonymous

              The perturbation step of loop modeling occurs in centroid mode – a reduced sidechain representation. Reading between the lines a bit, this error almost certainly means there’s no valid centroid representation of your ligand (since you didn’t create one), so when the perturbation step tries to run it can’t make a centroid version of your protein and it crashes.

              Here’s two things to try:
              A) skip the perturbation step (“-remodel no” or something similar). This may reduce the sampling the protocol does, although I think with KIC it’s not really an issue.
              B) Try adding your ligand to the centroid residue type set. Look for a flag called -extra_res_cen and pass it your ligand file. (Try passing it the fullatom ligand parameter file you already have and cross your fingers. If that doesn’t work, you’ll have to make a centroid parameter file, I have no idea how to do that.)

            • #4757
              Anonymous

                With -extra_res_cen it gives me the error below. I get the same if I use -remodel no.

                protocols.looprelax: ==== Loop protocol: =================================================
                protocols.looprelax: remodel perturb_kic
                protocols.looprelax: intermedrelax no
                protocols.looprelax: refine refine_kic
                protocols.looprelax: relax fastrelax

                ERROR: unrecognized atom_type_name aroC
                ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/chemical/AtomTypeSet.hh line: 76

              • #4758
                Anonymous

                  I assume you’re familiar with The Matrix.

                  The Blue Pill: option A above, skip the centroid perturbation step. -remodel no wasn’t input quite right somehow, because it still says “remodel perturb_kic”. Can you post the options file you tried?

                  The Red Pill: look at the files (rosetta_database)/chemical/atom_type_sets/fa_standard/atom_properties.txt, chemical/atom_type_sets/centroid/atom_properties.txt, and your params file. You’ll notice your params file has atom types listed in the fa_standard atom types, NOT listed in the centroid atom types. Try modifying either centroid/atom_properties to include your ligand’s atom types (copy them from the fa_standard atom types), or modifying a copy of your ligand paramter file to use only the centroid atom types (sort of limited). This can be made to work eventually but it’s going to be a fair amount of trial and error.

                  (It may also be informative to compare some of the centroid and fa_standard residue types; sub in residue_type_sets for atom_type_sets).

              Viewing 5 reply threads
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.