loop modelling/Rosetta 3.4, 3.5

Member Site Forums Rosetta 3 Rosetta 3 – General loop modelling/Rosetta 3.4, 3.5

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #1633
      Anonymous

        Hi,

        I run the loop modelling script with *Rosetta 3.4* and it works. But when I employ the same script
        with *Rosetta 3.5*, I face with this error:
        **exceeds the number of residues in the Pose: pose_index_ = 141 vs pose.total_residue() 0***

        Cheers,
        Berk

      • #8987
        Anonymous

          Hi berk,

          Can you be more specific – which script? A RosettaScript from the demos or the loop_model application?
          What are your inputs?

        • #8989
          Anonymous

            Hi Berk,

            Could you post the commandline and input files you use which are giving you this behavior?

            Thanks.

          • #8990
            Anonymous

              My Loop,
              LOOP 141 154

              mpirun.lsf /RS/progs/rosetta/3.5_gcc_openmpi/bin/loopmodel.mpi.linuxgccrelease
              -database /RS/progs/rosetta/3.5_database
              -loops:input_pdb inputs/Drd2.B99991000.pdb
              -loops:loop_file inputs/Loop.file
              -loops:frag_sizes 9 3 1
              -loops:frag_files inputs/aat000_09_05.200_v1_3.gz inputs/aat000_09_05.200_v1_3.gz none
              -loops:remodel quick_ccd
              -loops:remodel perturb_kic
              -loops:refine refine_kic
              -loops:fix_natsc true
              -loops:neighbor_dist 0.0
              -loops.max_kic_build_attempts 100
              -loops:extended
              -ex1
              -ex2
              -out:pdb
              -out:prefix TEST
              -out:file:fullatom
              -nstruct 1000
              -out:overwrite

            • #8993
              Anonymous

                I’m relatively new to rosetta, but I think this might help:

                try using -s instead of -loops:input_pdb

              • #9232
                Anonymous

                  Thats great , worked fine in my case. Thank you.

              Viewing 3 reply threads
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.