- This topic has 9 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 10 months ago by Anonymous.
January 24, 2011 at 6:12 pm #745Anonymous
The Beta version of PyRosetta 2.0 is ready for download, here is a brief summary of changes:
Approximately 4x more C++ namespace are bound.
All classes now have proper base classes.
Various usability improvements: better help, better error detection, etc.
Build system has been completely reworked. Supports parallel builds. Beta support for Clang++.
Build bases on Rosetta 3.2 release code (also available soon!).
Binaries for the following platforms are ready for download:
Mac OS X 10.6 (64Bit)
Scientific Linux (64Bit)
Ubuntu Linux distributions (32/64Bit)
For more information and download links please see: https://sites.google.com/site/pyrosetta
January 26, 2011 at 2:32 am #4853Anonymous
Does this version require Rosetta 3.2, and if so do you have an estimated date when it will be released?
January 26, 2011 at 3:46 am #4854Anonymous
No to the first, and I don’t know to the second.
January 26, 2011 at 3:54 am #4855Anonymous
This version of PyRosetta uses Rosetta3.2 libs. But as Steven mentioned it does not require any additional downloads.
January 31, 2011 at 2:46 pm #4903Anonymous
I downloaded and tried to use the Mac version, but I get this error:
Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Mar 20 2010, 11:39:18)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) (dot 1)] on darwin
Type “help”, “copyright”, “credits” or “license” for more information.
>>> from rosetta import *
Traceback (most recent call last):
“, line 1, in
File “rosetta/__init__.py”, line 11, in
File “rosetta/utility/__init__.py”, line 1, in
from __utility_all_at_once_ import *
ImportError: dlopen(rosetta/utility/__utility_all_at_once_.so, 2): no suitable image found. Did find:
rosetta/utility/__utility_all_at_once_.so: mach-o, but wrong architecture
Which is the right Python/GCC configuration that was used to compile PyRosetta?
Thanks, have a nice day
February 1, 2011 at 8:24 am #4910Anonymous
Hello. Are the constraints related functions implemented in PyRosetta 2.Beta? Can anyone help me about how to introduce a customized constraint? I need to introduce a constraint for the angle between two NON-consecutive bonds.
Thanks in advance for any help, have a nice day!
February 1, 2011 at 3:51 pm #4912Anonymous
You may be able to define a series of AtomPairConstraints to have the same effect as the angle constraints – if you know the length of three sides of a triangle, then the angle is known as well. Does that make sense?
February 2, 2011 at 9:06 am #4917Anonymous
I may try that, but my problem is more technical: how do I define in PyRosetta a constraint?
Thanks a lot for any help
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.